Skip to main content
· 9/22/1994

Daniels v. Anderson

Citations

  • 642 N.E.2d 128
  • 162 Ill. 2d 47
  • 204 Ill. Dec. 666
  • 1994 Ill. LEXIS 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a finding of waiver on grounds that “Had [defendant] raised the equitable conversion doctrine in the trial court, [plaintiff] may have responded specifically to this theory with evidence and argument”
  • allowing new theory for the first time on appeal would weaken the adversarial process, our system of appellate jurisdiction, and cause prejudice, since opponents may have been able to present evidence to discredit the theory had it been raised in the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.