Grutter v. Bollinger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that proposed intervenors, who were applicants to the University of Michigan, had a substantial legal interest in the school’s admissions process
• finding that proposed intervenors, who were applicants to University of Michigan, had a substantial legal interest in the school's admissions process
• “CAAP asserts that its membership consists of individuals, some of whom are parents or grandparents of prospective African-American and Latino students in the State of Michigan.”
• intervenors were a group of African-American and Latino/a individuals who applied or intended to apply to the University of Michigan and claimed that resolution of the case would threaten their access

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Utah Ass'n of Counties v. Clinton
  Tenth Circuit· 2001-07-10· cited 135×
• Kathy Stupak-Thrall,plaintiffs-Appellees v. Daniel Glickman,defendants, the Wilderness Society, Proposed Intervenors-Appellants
  Sixth Circuit· 2000-09-01· cited 121×
• United States v. Michigan
  Sixth Circuit· 2005-08-24· cited 108×
• In Re Troutman Enterprises, Inc., Debtor. Donald F. Harker Iii, Trustee v. Rufus Troutman, Terry Troutman, and Lester Troutman
  Sixth Circuit· 2002-03-15· cited 102×
• Blount-Hill v. Zelman
  Sixth Circuit· 2011-02-16· cited 81×
• Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. Granholm
  Sixth Circuit· 2007-09-06· cited 77×
• Oless Brumfield v. William Dodd
  Fifth Circuit· 2014-04-10· cited 64×
• Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. R.G. &. G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 2018-03-07· cited 56×
• United States v. Tennessee
  Sixth Circuit· 2001-08-08· cited 56×
• Northland Family Planning Clinic, Inc. v. Cox
  Sixth Circuit· 2007-06-04· cited 52×
• Barbara Grutter v. Lee Bollinger, (01-1447), Kimberly James, Intervening (01-1516)
  Sixth Circuit· 2002-05-14· cited 41×
• United States v. City of Detroit
  Sixth Circuit· 2013-04-08· cited 38×
• Cotter v. Massachusetts Ass'n of Minority Law Enforcement Officers
  First Circuit· 2000-07-17· cited 36×
• Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-15· cited 27×
• Meeks v. Schofield
  Sixth Circuit· 2015-06-02· cited 26×
• Wolfsen Land & Cattle Co v. Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations
  Federal Circuit· 2012-09-21· cited 25×
• American Ass'n of People with Disabilities v. Herrera
  D. New Mexico· 2008-09-09· cited 16×
• Wineries of the Old Mission Peninsula Ass'n v. Twp. of Peninsula, Mich.
  Sixth Circuit· 2022-07-27· cited 15×
• Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College
  First Circuit· 2015-12-09· cited 14×
• Miller v. Blackwell
  S.D. Ohio· 2004-10-27· cited 10×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Trbovich v. United Mine Workers
  Supreme Court· 1972-01-17· cited 867×
• Martin v. Wilks
  Supreme Court· 1989-08-11· cited 565×
• Michigan State Afl-Cio v. Miller
  Sixth Circuit· 1997-03-19· cited 254×
• Norman Purnell, Administrator of the Estate of Armstead Land, A/K/A Armstad Land v. City of Akron v. Damon Campbell Carissa Campbell
  Sixth Circuit· 1991-02-13· cited 134×
• In Re Birmingham Reverse Discrimination Employment Litigation
  Eleventh Circuit· 1988-01-25· cited 75×
• Hopwood v. State of Tex.
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-05-11· cited 41×
• Peter G. ASPROS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent
  Seventh Circuit· 1990-06-14· cited 20×