Skip to main content
· 7/17/2000

Cotter v. Massachusetts Ass'n of Minority Law Enforcement Officers

Citations

  • 219 F.3d 31
  • 47 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 279
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 16934
  • 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 839
  • 2000 WL 964565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that there may be “unusual cases” where an intervenor could satisfy the interest requirement of Rule 24(a)(2) without having a stake in the controversy needed to satisfy Article III
  • “[E]nough likelihood of conflict or divergence of interest exists to defeat any claim that ‘the applicant’s interest is adequately represented by existing parties’ * * * .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Stahl, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.