Indiana Court of Appeals· 8/21/2000
Grubb v. State
Citations
- 734 N.E.2d 589
- 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 1305
- 2000 WL 1199537
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that exclusionary rule did not bar introduction of statements obtained in violation of probationer’s Fifth Amendment rights at probation revocation proceeding
- holding that exclusionary rule did not bar introduction of statements obtained in violation of probationer’s Fifth Amendment rights at probation revocation proceeding
- holding that exclusionary rule did not bar introduction of statements obtained in violation of probationer’s Fifth Amendment rights at probation revocation proceeding
- applying harmless error analysis to find that even assuming it was error to admit videotaped statements of children in support of revocation based on allegations of child molestation, defendant’s probation could have been revoked because he consumed alcohol
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sharpnack, Robb, Bailey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Marsh v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-11-24· cited 46×
- Piper v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-06-27· cited 22×
- Brabandt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-10-27· cited 19×
- King v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-02-27· cited 16×
- Black v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-08-29· cited 10×
- Mathews v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-06-18· cited 8×
- Dallarius T. Jackson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-02-13
- Victor N. Newbern v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-01-17
- Tywon D. Alexander v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-04-25
- Martez McGraw v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-02-21
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 1,569×
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 588×
- Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-03-03· cited 320×
- Isaac v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-12-23· cited 64×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-12-21· cited 62×
- Brooks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-03-23· cited 29×
- Rivera v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-06-18· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.