Skip to main content

Grubb v. State

Citations

  • 734 N.E.2d 589
  • 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 1305
  • 2000 WL 1199537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that exclusionary rule did not bar introduction of statements obtained in violation of probationer’s Fifth Amendment rights at probation revocation proceeding
  • holding that exclusionary rule did not bar introduction of statements obtained in violation of probationer’s Fifth Amendment rights at probation revocation proceeding
  • holding that exclusionary rule did not bar introduction of statements obtained in violation of probationer’s Fifth Amendment rights at probation revocation proceeding
  • applying harmless error analysis to find that even assuming it was error to admit videotaped statements of children in support of revocation based on allegations of child molestation, defendant’s probation could have been revoked because he consumed alcohol

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Robb, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.