Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/10/2008

Grosshuesch v. Cramer

Citations

659 S.E.2d 112
377 S.C. 12
2008 S.C. LEXIS 86

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

declining to address an assignment of error to the circuit court's denial of a request to impose sanctions on a party because the question was not immediately appealable
\[O]ur jurisprudence clearly establishes that the proper procedure to determine whether a party should be held in contempt is to bring a summons and a rule to show cause.\
noting discovery orders are interlocutory and not immediately appealable
where the Court noted that the trial court properly ruled on a second discovery matter involving a deposition after the parties had filed appeals from the trial court’s first order because the first order dealt with the subject of initial discovery responses
where the Court noted that the trial court properly ruled on a second discovery matter involving a deposition after the parties had filed appeals from the trial court's first order because the first order dealt with the subject of initial discovery responses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones, Beatty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.