Wallace v. Interamerican Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even though the court previously heard interlocutory appeals, issue of whether such orders were actually appealable had not been raised
• holding that even though the court previously heard interlocutory appeals, issue of whether such orders were actually appealable had not been raised
• fact that Court has previously entertained appeals from interlocutory orders does not foreclose a finding, when issue is raised, that the order is not directly appealable
• fact that Court has previously entertained appeals from interlocutory orders does not foreclose a finding, when issue is raised, that the order is not directly appealable
• the fact that an appellate court may have decided an appeal of a particular type of order on the merits is not dispositive of whether the order is appealable when the issue of appealability was not raised

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).