Grosshuesch v. Cramer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to address an assignment of error to the circuit court's denial of a request to impose sanctions on a party because the question was not immediately appealable
• \[O]ur jurisprudence clearly establishes that the proper procedure to determine whether a party should be held in contempt is to bring a summons and a rule to show cause.\
• noting discovery orders are interlocutory and not immediately appealable
• where the Court noted that the trial court properly ruled on a second discovery matter involving a deposition after the parties had filed appeals from the trial court’s first order because the first order dealt with the subject of initial discovery responses
• where the Court noted that the trial court properly ruled on a second discovery matter involving a deposition after the parties had filed appeals from the trial court's first order because the first order dealt with the subject of initial discovery responses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).