Skip to main content

Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Citations

  • 943 A.2d 242
  • 596 Pa. 317
  • 2008 Pa. LEXIS 260

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • van, and not merely modifications thereto, was orthopedic appliance for quadriplegic claimant necessary to remedy lack of mobility resulting from work injury
  • quadriplegic claimant may be entitled to a wheelchair accessible van because the van may constitute an \orthopedic appliance\ under Section 306(f.1)(1)(ii) of the Workers' Compensation Act (Act), [2] 77 P.S. § 531(1)(ii), depending on the specific facts of the case
  • quadriplegic claimant may be entitled to a wheelchair accessible van because the van may constitute an “orthopedic appliance” under Section 306(f.l)(l)(ii) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), 2 77 P.S. § 531(1)(ii), depending on the specific facts of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eak, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Petrilla, Griffiths, Eakin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.