Claim of Nallan v. Motion Picture Studio Mechanics Union, Local No. 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing, in the context of whether a board member of a labor union was an employee of the union, that the board member’s stipend did not constitute a salary or compensation under workers’ compensation laws
• paraplegic claimant not entitled to a new, specially equipped automobile for travel to and from work
• a specially-equipped automobile held not to be a “medical apparatus or device”
• a specially-equipped automobile held not to be a \medical apparatus or device\
• van not a \medical apparatus or device\ under New York statute
• same, applied to a paraplegic

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).