Skip to main content

Griffis v. State

Citations

  • 593 So. 2d 308
  • 1992 WL 15878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an unauthorized motion for rehearing does not toll defendant's time for filing a notice of appeal
  • holding that rule 3.800 does not authorize a motion for rehearing and therefore does not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal
  • concluding that a motion for rehearing was not authorized for an order entered on a motion filed pursuant to rule 3.800 under a prior version of the rule that did not specifically permit a rehearing of such orders
  • noting that unless a motion for rehearing is clearly authorized, the motion does not postpone rendition of the order
  • holding that there is no authority for filing a motion for rehearing of an order disposing of a rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence; thus, motion for rehearing does not postpone rendition of order so as to make notice of appeal timely
  • holding that there is no authority for a motion for rehearing of an order disposing of a rule 3.800 motion to correct illegal sentence and, therefore, the motion for rehearing did not postpone rendition of the order so as to make the notice of appeal timely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.