Longo v. Longo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• motions for rehearing directed to interlocutory orders are not authorized and do not toll time for filing appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Griffis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-01-28· cited 37×
• Deal v. Deal
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-06· cited 18×
• Ferenc v. Ferenc
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-13· cited 2×
• Vliegenthart v. Grover
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-07· cited 2×
• McLevy v. McLevy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-21· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wagner v. Bieley, Wagner & Associates, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1972-05-10· cited 79×
• Potucek v. Smeja
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-06· cited 22×
• Smith v. Weede
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-12· cited 18×
• Hubert v. DIV. OF ADMIN., ST. DEPT. OF TRANSP.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-02-02· cited 9×
• Fibreboard Corp. v. Ward
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-19· cited 7×
• FLA. FARM BUREAU INS. CO. v. Austin Carpet Serv., Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-01-16· cited 6×