District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/5/2003
Bridges v. State
Citations
- 863 So. 2d 366
- 2003 WL 22867670
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction because notice of appeal was not timely; defendant’s pro se letter requesting reconsideration of order denying motion to withdraw plea was unauthorized
- “[T]here is no authority under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(/) or Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h), for filing a motion for rehearing of an order denying a motion to withdraw pleas.”
- “[T]here is no authority under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(l) or Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h) [9.020(i), as amended], for filing a motion for rehearing of an order denying a motion to withdraw plea[].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pleus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Grant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-25· cited 4×
- Vasquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-20· cited 3×
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-25· cited 3×
- Ernest Archie v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-20
- Fuller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-01
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.