Lightsey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court erred in denying continuance where due to the State’s late response to discovery, the defendant was unable to depose certain witnesses and complete his investigation prior to trial
• trial court erred in denying continuance where due to state's tardy response to discovery demand, defendant was unable to depose certain witnesses or complete an investigation into the facts prior to trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-02-08· cited 54×
• Loren v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-15· cited 11×
• Griffin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-11· cited 5×
• Meadows v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-10-29· cited 2×
• Wallace v. State
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1982-11-03

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Sumbry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-04-04· cited 19×