Griffin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• furlough programs are internal rehabilitation procedures designed to address the problem of prison overcrowding and are not an integral part of an Inmate’s sentencing
• ex post facto clause precludes retroactive application of change in timetable for review of parole eligibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• California Department of Corrections v. Morales
  Supreme Court· 1995-04-25· cited 1,142×
• Roller v. Gunn
  Fourth Circuit· 1997-02-19· cited 187×
• State v. Von Dohlen
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-05-28· cited 85×
• Barton v. South Carolina Department of Probation Parole & Pardon Services
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-07-03· cited 25×
• State v. Collins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-05· cited 24×
• Jernigan v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-01· cited 19×
• Skipper v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-07-31· cited 16×
• Crooks v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-05-12· cited 5×
• Plyler ex rel. Class in Plyler v. Evatt
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-11-08· cited 5×
• South Carolina v. Griffin
  Supreme Court· 1994-01-24

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miller v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 1,316×
• State v. Gunter
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-02· cited 15×
• Gunter v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-03-06· cited 14×
• Elmore v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-23· cited 13×