Elmore v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the law existing at the time of the offense, not at the time of sentencing, determines whether an ex post facto violation has occurred
• change in law which alters elements of offense or increases punishment results in ex post facto violation
• retrospective reduction in work benefits affecting parole eligibility is ex post facto violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Al-Shabazz v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-14· cited 168×
• State v. Walls
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-01-14· cited 34×
• State v. Collins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-05· cited 24×
• Jernigan v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-01· cited 19×
• State v. Tucker
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-11-06· cited 18×
• Griffin v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-07-19· cited 15×
• Girouard v. Hofmann
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2009-06-19· cited 10×
• James v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-01-10· cited 4×
• Harris v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-12-07· cited 3×
• Farris v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-25· cited 1×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-17

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miller v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 1,316×
• Lindsey v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1937-05-17· cited 556×
• Warden v. Marrero
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 290×
• State v. Matthews
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-10-24· cited 40×
• State v. Cutler
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-03-18· cited 14×