Gunter v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• change from annual to biannual parole hearing does not violate ex post facto clause
• “The Board of Corrections has discretion whether to allow an inmate even to participate in a work release program.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Roller v. Gunn
  Fourth Circuit· 1997-02-19· cited 187×
• C.T. Akins, Jay M. Fate, Michael Schroeder v. Wayne Snow, Jr., Chairman State Board of Pardons & Paroles
  Eleventh Circuit· 1991-02-07· cited 69×
• Barton v. South Carolina Department of Probation Parole & Pardon Services
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-07-03· cited 25×
• Jernigan v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-01· cited 19×
• Skipper v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-07-31· cited 16×
• Griffin v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-07-19· cited 15×
• Roller v. Cavanaugh
  Fourth Circuit· 1993-01-15· cited 8×
• Crooks v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-05-12· cited 5×
• Plyler ex rel. Class in Plyler v. Evatt
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-11-08· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weaver v. Graham
  Supreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
• In Re Jackson
  California Supreme Court· 1985-08-08· cited 67×
• Morris v. Meachum
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1986-05-06· cited 15×
• Mellinger v. Idaho Department of Corrections
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1988-06-02· cited 15×