Federal Claims· 2/25/1997
Gregory v. United States
Citations
- 37 Fed. Cl. 388
- 1997 U.S. Claims LEXIS 38
- 1997 WL 87227
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the difference between the promissory estoppel “sword,” which is not within this Court’s jurisdiction, and the equitable estoppel “shield”
- “[Plaintiffs invoke the doctrine of estoppel to establish the existence of a contract upon which to base their claims. As our cases make clear, however, plaintiffs cannot be permitted to establish this crucial element of their case on the basis of estop-pel.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Margolis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Best Foam Fabricators, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1997-07-18· cited 28×
- Son Broadcasting, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1998-12-04· cited 24×
- Lamirage, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1999-06-17· cited 22×
- Sinclair v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2003-04-18· cited 12×
- Koby v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2000-06-21· cited 10×
- Alliant Techsystems Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2007-01-04· cited 10×
- Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1998-09-24· cited 9×
- Lawndale Restoration Ltd. Partnership ex rel. Boulevard Realty Services Corp. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-11-23· cited 8×
- Jones v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2001-06-07· cited 4×
- Kingman Reef Atoll Investments, L.L.C. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2014-06-30· cited 3×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court· 1946-04-01· cited 4,157×
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceFederal Circuit· 1988-05-16· cited 1,960×
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1997-01-16· cited 518×
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1984-12-10· cited 373×
- Louise J. Hamlet v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1989-04-27· cited 347×
- Roland Spruill v. Merit Systems Protection BoardFederal Circuit· 1992-12-21· cited 246×
- Alexander v. Gino's Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-11-03· cited 177×
- Gould, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1995-10-11· cited 163×
- Russell Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1976-07-09· cited 160×
- Coplen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 122×
- Do-Well MacHine Shop, Inc. v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1989-03-14· cited 108×
- Jerome Jablon, M.D. v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1981-09-28· cited 103×
- Thanet Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1979-01-24· cited 97×
- Emeco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1973-10-17· cited 94×
- Romala Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1991-03-12· cited 54×
- Molton, Allen & Williams, Inc. v. HarrisD.C. Circuit· 1980-01-07· cited 34×
- Biagioli v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1983-04-18· cited 33×
- Peckmann v. ThompsonSeventh Circuit· 1992-07-02· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.