Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 8/17/2001

Gregory Lott v. Ralph Coyle, Warden

Citations

  • 261 F.3d 594
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18516
  • 2001 WL 930028

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the district court permissibly denied motion to compel where parties failed to confer by telephone conference
  • holding that petitioner’s presentation of a Brady claim does not permit him to put forward on habeas corpus review other Brady claims predicated on factually dissimilar premises
  • finding that appellate counsel was not ineffective when he failed to anticipate a change in the law and failed to argue a “confused point of law”
  • holding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to make a particular argument because “we cannot conclude that . . . counsel should have reasonably anticipated” the change in the law even though there were conflicting opinions in the state courts on the issue
  • finding — in a capital case — that a colloquy much more perfunctory than that in the present case was constitutionally sufficient
  • finding — in a capital case — that a colloquy much more perfunctory than that in the present case was constitutionally sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Boggs, Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

109 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.