Skip to main content
· 9/8/2006

Scott M. Smith v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections

Citations

  • 463 F.3d 426
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 22843
  • 2006 WL 2571395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding ap- pellate counsel is constitutionally required to provide closing duties to a de- fendant, including notifying the defendant of the outcome of the appeal
  • explaining that AEDPA’s one-year statute of limitations is not jurisdictional and that the court may proceed to the merits of the petition “in the interest of judicial economy.”
  • declining to address statute-of-limitations defense on appeal in part because AEDPA's statute of limitations is not jurisdictional
  • declining to address statute-of-limitations defense on appeal in part because AEDPA’s statute of limitations is not jurisdictional
  • “We may affirm on any grounds supported by the record, even though they may be different from the grounds relied on by the district court.”
  • the Ohio Supreme Court’s denial of a motion for delayed appeal, even when it did not give any reasons for the denial, “is an adequate procedural ground to foreclose federal habeas review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Griffin, Cudahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.