Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/28/1990
Green v. State
Citations
- 799 S.W.2d 756
- 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 191
- 1990 WL 182411
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “purely technical discrepancies in dates or times do not automatically vitiate the validity of search or arrest warrants” (emphasis in original)
- providing that technical defects in a warrant may be cured by explanatory testimony at the suppression hearing explaining that the error was clerical
- holding that discrepancies in dates of warrant documents, such as a warrant being dated earlier than its supporting affidavit, do not invalidate the warrant if there is testimony in the record showing that the discrepancy is merely a clerical or typographical error
- holding warrant was not supported by probable cause because State failed to demonstrate why affidavit dated five days prior to search warrant’s execution was clerical error
- holding warrant was not supported by probable cause because State failed to demonstrate why affidavit dated five days prior to search warrant‘s execution was clerical error
- stating that the two objectives of the law concerning search warrants are to ensure that there is adequate probable cause to search and to prevent a mistake in the execution of the warrant against an innocent third party
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, McCormick, White, Berchelmann, Sturns
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
84 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roberts v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1998-02-20· cited 57×
- Castelan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-08-09· cited 42×
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-06-01· cited 42×
- Mason v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1992-12-23· cited 38×
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-18· cited 31×
- State v. TiptonTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1997-01-29· cited 23×
- Hughes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2011-03-30· cited 23×
- State v. RosarioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-30· cited 20×
- Jon Paul Proctor v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2011-10-06· cited 17×
- Green v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1994-06-30· cited 16×
- Williams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1996-08-29· cited 15×
- Real Property Located at 4125 Blanton, Wichita Falls, Wichita County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2007-07-12· cited 13×
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-23· cited 9×
- State v. EndoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1996-09-17· cited 8×
- Meeks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-18· cited 8×
- Crayton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-01-27· cited 8×
- Greene v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-11-17· cited 7×
- Affatato v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-06-03· cited 6×
- Anthony Fernando Strange v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2014-09-18· cited 6×
- Daniel G. Jarnagin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2012-11-30· cited 5×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Rougeau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-09-23· cited 100×
- Phenix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-07-19· cited 94×
- Riojas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-12-10· cited 79×
- Oubre v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-11-03· cited 67×
- Doescher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-09-27· cited 64×
- Bridges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-12-20· cited 43×
- Faulkner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-06-09· cited 40×
- Lyons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-12-12· cited 38×
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1955-11-09· cited 22×
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-02-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.