Phenix v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a search warrant’s incorporation of an affidavit describing the place to be searched with particularity “would be sufficient to make the description of the place to be searched a part of the warrant itself”
• holding that when a search warrant incorporates the supporting affidavit and the affidavit describes the place to be searched with particularity, this is sufficient to make the description of the place to be searched part of the warrant
• stating that seizure conducted within parameters of a valid search warrant did not violate defendant’s constitutional rights where officers acted in accordance with procedural guidelines
• holding search warrant’s incorporation by reference of affidavit was sufficient to make description of place to be searched part of warrant itself
• stating that seizure conducted within parameters of a valid search warrant did not violate defendant = s constitutional rights where officers acted in accordance with procedural guidelines
• the rule against hearsay does not apply when an extrajudicial written utterance is admitted for its nontestimonial value as evidence of a circumstance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).