Skip to main content

Martinez v. State

Citations

  • 285 S.W.2d 221
  • 162 Tex. Crim. 356
  • 1955 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1652

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that incorrectly dated jurat to supporting affidavit would not \vitiate the warrant\ based on explanatory testimony heard by trial court
  • holding that incorrectly dated jurat to supporting affidavit would not “vitiate the warrant” based on explanatory testimony heard by trial court
  • holding that incorrectly dated jurat to supporting affidavit would not “vitiate the warrant” based on explanatory testimony heard by trial court
  • holding that incorrectly dated jurat to supporting affidavit would not \vitiate the warrant\ based on explanatory testimony heard by trial court
  • upholding warrant when testimony was offered that “December” was mistakenly written on warrant affidavit instead of “January”
  • upholding warrant when testimony was offered that \December\ was mistakenly written on warrant affidavit instead of \January\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woodley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.