Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Eighth Circuit· 2/1/2002

Green v. Ameritrade, Inc.

Citations

  • 279 F.3d 590
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the district court may be affirmed on any basis supported in the record
  • suggesting that a plaintiff could avoid SLUSA preemption \so long as his state-law claim does not require him to prove there was a sale or purchase of a covered security in reliance on the misrepresentation\
  • suggesting that a plaintiff could avoid SLUSA preemption “so long as his state-law claim does not require him to prove there was a sale or purchase of a covered security in reliance on the misrepresentation”
  • finding no SLUSA preemption where plaintiff “allegefd] no sale or purchase of a covered security, only that he did not receive the type of information from [defendant] for which he believed he had contracted and paid twenty dollars monthly”
  • holding that SLUSA should be interpreted based on cases interpreting identical language in SEC Rule 10b — 5
  • “A covered class action is any suit brought by a 12 No. 18-2875 While the plain language of each subparagraph of § 78bb(f)(5)(B)(i

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Green v. Ameritrade, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.