Duane Carlson v. Arrowhead Concrete Works, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Waco requires that the reviewed decision be both conclusive on the parties and logically and factually precedent to the remand order
• explaining that in Garmon, 359 U.S. at 244-47, “the Supreme Court held that neither state nor federal courts have jurisdiction over claims arising under § 7 or § 8 of the NLRA”
• “In every federal case the court must be satisfied that it has jurisdiction before it turns to the merits of other legal arguments.”
• “In every federal case the court must be satisfied that it has jurisdiction before it turns to the merits of other legal arguments.”
• “In every federal case the court must be satisfied that it has jurisdiction before it turns to the merits of other legal arguments.”
• City of Waco requires that reviewed decision be conclusive on parties and logically and factually precedent to remand order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).