Skip to main content
· 9/20/2013

Linda M. Neese v. State of Indiana

Citations

  • 994 N.E.2d 336
  • 2013 WL 5297298
  • 2013 Ind. App. LEXIS 454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a legislative exception to guilt constitutes an affirmative defense, rather than a material element of the offense, when it is placed in a separate sentence of subsection of the statute
  • evidence sufficient to support conviction of check deception when defendant traded her check for acquaintance’s cash knowing acquaintance could not obtain cash from bank because defendant had closed the checking account

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crone, Barnes, Pyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.