Graphicdata, LLC v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[W]e have determined that federal case law interpreting Title VII . . . is generally applicable to cases involving alleged violations of R. C. Chapter 4112.\
• “ ‘reliable, probative, and substantial evidence’ in an employment discrimination case brought pursuant to [Ohio Revised Code] Chapter 4112 means evidence sufficient to support a finding of discrimination under Title VII”
• “[Federal case law interpreting Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ... is generally applicable to cases involving alleged violations of R.C. Chapter 4112.”
• “[W]e have determined that federal case law interpreting Title VII ... is generally applicable to cases involving alleged violations of R.C. Chapter 4112.”
• “the elements and legal standards for establishing unlawful sex discrimination are the same under Ohio Rev. Code § 4112.02 and under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2”
• “[Fjederal case law interpreting Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ... is generally applicable to cases involving alleged violations of R.C. Chapter 4112.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).