Levi Strauss & Co., Applicant/appellant v. Genesco, Inc., Opposer/appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that mere assertions by counsel that a factual dispute exists are insufficient to avoid summary judgment
• stating that mere assertions by counsel that a factual dispute exists are insufficient to avoid summary judgment
• stating that counsel’s mere assertions do not establish genuine issues of material fact
• stating argument by counsel is insufficient to raise issues of fact
• argument cannot substitute for factual statements under oath that establish a genuine issue of material fact
• use by other parties undercuts argument that an asserted trademark identifies and distinguishes one particular source

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).