Skip to main content
· 12/6/2001

Grant v. May Department Stores Co.

Citations

  • 786 A.2d 580
  • 12 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1308
  • 2001 D.C. App. LEXIS 249
  • 2001 WL 1546312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that we rely on case law construing the ADA as persuasive authority when assessing disability claims under the DCHRA because both acts contain similar definitions of “disability”
  • deeming ADA precedent to be “persuasive” where “comparable sections of DCHRA” are concerned
  • deeming ADA precedent to be “persuasive” where “comparable sections of DCHRA” are concerned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reid, Glickman, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.