· 12/6/2001
Grant v. May Department Stores Co.
Citations
- 786 A.2d 580
- 12 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1308
- 2001 D.C. App. LEXIS 249
- 2001 WL 1546312
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that we rely on case law construing the ADA as persuasive authority when assessing disability claims under the DCHRA because both acts contain similar definitions of “disability”
- deeming ADA precedent to be “persuasive” where “comparable sections of DCHRA” are concerned
- deeming ADA precedent to be “persuasive” where “comparable sections of DCHRA” are concerned
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reid, Glickman, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.