Lyles v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• section 36-342 does not protect an employee who is discharged for violating work rules
• section 36-342 does not protect an employee who is discharged for violating work rules
• employer cannot be required to act as “a virtual guarantor of continued employment”
• employer cannot be required to act as \a virtual guarantor of continued employment\
• stating the elements of a DCWCA retaliation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).