Skip to main content
· 4/8/2004

Teru Chang v. Institute for Public-Private Partnerships, Inc.

Citations

  • 846 A.2d 318
  • 15 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1159
  • 9 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1485
  • 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 161
  • 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,725
  • 2004 WL 742806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]aking FMLA leave constitutes a ‘protected activity,’ [and] termination constitutes an ‘adverse employment decision.’” (citation omitted)
  • “Because the DCHRA definition of ‘disability’ closely resembles the definition of disability found in the [ADA] . . . we have considered decisions construing the ADA as persuasive in our decisions construing comparable sections of the DCHRA.” (cleaned up)
  • “To establish a prima facie case of retaliatory termination under the DCFMLA, a plaintiff must demonstrate that: (1) [he] was engaged in a protected activity; (2) [his] employer took an adverse employment action; and (3) there was a causal connection between the two.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farrell, Washington, Ferren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.