Graftenreed v. Seabaugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Daubert analysis was applicable only to “novel” scientific evidence, theory, or methodology
• noting that the Daubert factors apply only to \novel\ evidence, theory, or methodology
• permitting a chiropractor to give expert-witness testimony in a personal-injury case on the cause of the plaintiff’s injuries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).