Arrow International, Inc. v. Sparks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Daubert inquiry was not applicable where the physician’s expert testimony was not based on “novel” scientific evidence, theory, or methodology but rather on his experience and observations
• noting that while it was not necessary to apply Daubert to an expert’s testimony, the circuit court nonetheless conducted a reliability inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).