Skip to main content
· 11/30/1995

Graber v. Comstock Bank

Citations

  • 905 P.2d 1112
  • 111 Nev. 1421
  • 1995 Nev. LEXIS 162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that, when the fault of the defendant constitutes the basis for the rescission, the general rule that rescission requires full restoration does not apply, and it is appropriate that the defendant bear the loss in the transaction
  • declining to require complete restoration of consideration by guarantor seeking rescission of agreement, where guarantor had demonstrated fraud in the inducement by lender bank
  • “[T]he term ‘disregard’ implies that the arbitrator appreciates the existence of a clearly governing legal principle but decides to ignore or pay no attention to it.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.