Skip to main content
· 12/22/1976

Exber, Inc. v. Sletten Construction Company

Citations

  • 558 P.2d 517
  • 92 Nev. 721
  • 1976 Nev. LEXIS 733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “question of the timeliness of the demand for arbitration should have been resolved by arbitration”
  • questions of compliance with contractual limitations of time within which the demand for arbitration may be made, or provisions governing on whom, or in what manner, service of a demand for arbitration shall be made, are procedural matters for the arbitrators to decide
  • questions of compliance with contractual limitations of time within which the demand for arbitration may be made, or provisions governing on whom, or in what manner, service of a demand for arbitration shall be made, are procedural matters for the arbitrators to decide
  • affirming consolidation of pending proceedings between multiple parties
  • affirming consolidation of pending proceedings between multiple parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mowbray, Gunderson, Batjer, Zenoff, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.