· 12/22/1976
Exber, Inc. v. Sletten Construction Company
Citations
- 558 P.2d 517
- 92 Nev. 721
- 1976 Nev. LEXIS 733
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “question of the timeliness of the demand for arbitration should have been resolved by arbitration”
- questions of compliance with contractual limitations of time within which the demand for arbitration may be made, or provisions governing on whom, or in what manner, service of a demand for arbitration shall be made, are procedural matters for the arbitrators to decide
- questions of compliance with contractual limitations of time within which the demand for arbitration may be made, or provisions governing on whom, or in what manner, service of a demand for arbitration shall be made, are procedural matters for the arbitrators to decide
- affirming consolidation of pending proceedings between multiple parties
- affirming consolidation of pending proceedings between multiple parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mowbray, Gunderson, Batjer, Zenoff, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.