Skip to main content
· 1/4/1974

Governing Board v. Metcalf

Citations

  • 36 Cal. App. 3d 546
  • 111 Cal. Rptr. 724
  • 1974 Cal. App. LEXIS 697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the primary purpose of discharging a teacher is to protect his students, rather than to punish the teacher
  • holding that the primary purpose of discharging a teacher is to protect his students, rather than to punish the teacher
  • noting that “primary purpose of the [disciplinary] proceeding ... is to protect Metcalf’s pupils and other school children” and thus holding exclusionary rule inapplicable
  • proceeding to dismiss probationary public school teacher

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cobey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.