· 1/4/1974
Governing Board v. Metcalf
Citations
- 36 Cal. App. 3d 546
- 111 Cal. Rptr. 724
- 1974 Cal. App. LEXIS 697
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the primary purpose of discharging a teacher is to protect his students, rather than to punish the teacher
- holding that the primary purpose of discharging a teacher is to protect his students, rather than to punish the teacher
- noting that “primary purpose of the [disciplinary] proceeding ... is to protect Metcalf’s pupils and other school children” and thus holding exclusionary rule inapplicable
- proceeding to dismiss probationary public school teacher
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cobey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.