Peter W. v. San Francisco Unified School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no “conceivable ‘workability of a rule of care’ against which [teachers’] alleged conduct may be measured”
• finding no conceivable workability of a rule of care against which [teachers’] alleged conduct may be measured
• finding no conceivable workability of a rule of care against which [teachers’] alleged conduct maybe measured
• finding no \conceivable workability of a rule of care against which [teachers'] alleged conduct may be measured\
• “According to the familiar California formula, the allegations requisite to a cause of action for negligence are (1) facts showing a duty of care in the defendant, (2) negligence constituting a breach of the duty, and (3
• refusing to recognize a 7 cause of action for education malpractice; Paulsen v. Golden Gate Univ., 25 Cal. 3d 803, 808 8 (1979) (“There is a widely accepted rule of judicial nonintervention into the academic affairs of 9 schools.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).