Sixth Circuit· 5/1/1987
Gottfried v. Frankel
Citations
- 818 F.2d 485
- 125 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2321
- 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5691
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that reinstatement of union members by the district court was just and proper
- holding a six-month delay between issuance of the administrative complaint and the Section 10(j) petition to be insufficient to defeat the just and proper analysis
- “we find it persuasive that Sixth Circuit cases analyzing section 10(j) petitions have been filed by a Regional Director. . . . In fact, we have not discovered a section 10(j) case in any circuit which was not filed by a Regional Director.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Frankl v. HTH Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2011-07-13· cited 84×
- Starbucks Corp. v. McKinneySupreme Court· 2024-06-13· cited 52×
- Sharp Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Webco Industries, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2000-07-11· cited 21×
- M. Kathleen McKinney v. Ozburn-Hessey LogisticsSixth Circuit· 2017-11-09· cited 15×
- United States v. 630 Ardmore Dr., City of Durham, ParkwoodM.D. North Carolina· 2001-11-01· cited 10×
- Overstreet v. El Paso Disposal, L.P.W.D. Texas· 2009-10-30· cited 6×
- Dunbar Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Landis Plastics, Inc.N.D. New York· 1997-09-03· cited 5×
- D'AMICO v. Cox Creek Refining Co.D. Maryland· 1989-06-14· cited 4×
- M. Kathleen McKinney v. Starbucks Corp.Sixth Circuit· 2023-08-08· cited 4×
- Ahearn v. Jackson Hospital Corp.Sixth Circuit· 2003-12-05· cited 3×
- Hooks Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLCW.D. Tennessee· 2011-04-05· cited 2×
- Glasser v. Heartland Health Care CenterE.D. Michigan· 2003-11-13· cited 2×
- No. 91-6141Sixth Circuit· 1992-06-04
- Lineback, Rik v. Spurlino MaterialsSeventh Circuit· 2008-10-08
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 1,008×
- Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 575×
- United Food Workers Union, Locals 197, 373, 428, 588, 775, 839, 870, 1119, 1179 & 1532 v. Alpha Beta Co.Ninth Circuit· 1984-07-10· cited 185×
- Seeler v. Trading Port, Inc.Second Circuit· 1975-05-27· cited 100×
- Shattuck Denn Mining Corporation, (Iron King Branch) v. National Labor Relations BoardNinth Circuit· 1966-05-09· cited 84×
- Kobell v. Suburban Lines, Inc.Third Circuit· 1984-03-20· cited 72×
- Gottfried v. FrankelSixth Circuit· 1987-05-01· cited 70×
- Kaynard v. Palby Lingerie, Inc.Second Circuit· 1980-07-07· cited 65×
- Angle v. SacksTenth Circuit· 1967-08-28· cited 62×
- Squillacote v. Local 248, Meat & Allied Food WorkersSeventh Circuit· 1976-04-13· cited 52×
- Oneita Knitting Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardFourth Circuit· 1967-03-06· cited 39×
- Eisenberg v. Wellington Hall Nursing Home, Inc.Third Circuit· 1981-06-17· cited 32×
- Levine v. C & W Mining Co.Sixth Circuit· 1979-12-11· cited 30×
- National Labor Relations Board v. Plastilite CorporationEighth Circuit· 1967-03-30· cited 26×
- Sheeran v. American Commercial Lines, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1982-07-12· cited 25×
- National Labor Relations Board v. Dixie Gas, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1963-12-09· cited 22×
- Bastian-Blessing, Division of Golconda Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardSixth Circuit· 1973-02-21· cited 19×
- Ambling v. Blackstone Cattle Co., Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1987-04-28· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.