Sixth Circuit· 5/1/1987
Gottfried v. Frankel
Citations
- 818 F.2d 485
- 125 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2321
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- conflicting evidence no detraction to determination of reasonable cause
- “[Dismissal is not appropriate unless the party has been prejudiced”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Contie, Martin, Nelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gerard P. Fleischut, Regional Director for the 26th Region of the National Labor Relations Board v. Nixon Detroit Diesel, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1988-10-07· cited 86×
- Arlook v. S. Lichtenberg & Co.Eleventh Circuit· 1992-01-16· cited 54×
- Csx Transportation, Inc. v. Tennessee State Board of EqualizationSixth Circuit· 1992-05-15· cited 52×
- Lineback v. Spurlino Materials, LLCSeventh Circuit· 2008-10-08· cited 50×
- Pascarell ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Vibra Screw Inc.Third Circuit· 1990-06-07· cited 48×
- Kobell v. United Paperworkers International UnionSixth Circuit· 1992-06-04· cited 34×
- William C. Schaub, Jr. v. West Michigan Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2001-02-21· cited 27×
- Bavelis v. Doukas (In Re Bavelis)S.D. Ohio· 2011-05-31· cited 25×
- Gottfried v. FrankelSixth Circuit· 1987-05-01· cited 21×
- Osthus v. Whitesell Corp.Eighth Circuit· 2011-04-22· cited 20×
- Calatrello v. Automatic Sprinkler Corporation Of AmericaSixth Circuit· 1995-05-22· cited 20×
- Smith v. GradyS.D. Ohio· 2013-01-23· cited 15×
- People of State of Illinois v. PetersSeventh Circuit· 1989-04-05· cited 12×
- Arlook v. Lichtenberg & Company, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1992-01-16· cited 12×
- Frye ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Specialty Envelope, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1993-10-14· cited 12×
- Schaub v. Detroit Newspaper AgencySixth Circuit· 1998-05-06· cited 12×
- Glasser v. Heartland-University of Livonia, MI, LLCE.D. Michigan· 2009-04-07· cited 9×
- Gottfried v. Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n, Local Union No. 80Sixth Circuit· 1991-03-14· cited 9×
- Aguayo v. Tomco Carburetor CompanyFirst Circuit· 1988-08-05· cited 8×
- Jacobs v. University of CincinnatiS.D. Ohio· 1999-11-29· cited 8×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 1,008×
- Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 575×
- United Food Workers Union, Locals 197, 373, 428, 588, 775, 839, 870, 1119, 1179 & 1532 v. Alpha Beta Co.Ninth Circuit· 1984-07-10· cited 185×
- Seeler v. Trading Port, Inc.Second Circuit· 1975-05-27· cited 100×
- Shattuck Denn Mining Corporation, (Iron King Branch) v. National Labor Relations BoardNinth Circuit· 1966-05-09· cited 84×
- Kobell v. Suburban Lines, Inc.Third Circuit· 1984-03-20· cited 72×
- Kaynard v. Palby Lingerie, Inc.Second Circuit· 1980-07-07· cited 65×
- Angle v. SacksTenth Circuit· 1967-08-28· cited 62×
- Squillacote v. Local 248, Meat & Allied Food WorkersSeventh Circuit· 1976-04-13· cited 52×
- Oneita Knitting Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardFourth Circuit· 1967-03-06· cited 39×
- Eisenberg v. Wellington Hall Nursing Home, Inc.Third Circuit· 1981-06-17· cited 32×
- Levine v. C & W Mining Co.Sixth Circuit· 1979-12-11· cited 30×
- National Labor Relations Board v. Plastilite CorporationEighth Circuit· 1967-03-30· cited 26×
- Sheeran v. American Commercial Lines, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1982-07-12· cited 25×
- National Labor Relations Board v. Dixie Gas, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1963-12-09· cited 22×
- Bastian-Blessing, Division of Golconda Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardSixth Circuit· 1973-02-21· cited 19×
Other cases named Gottfried v. Frankel
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.