Ninth Circuit· 7/13/2011

Frankl v. HTH Corp.

Citations

650 F.3d 1334
2011 WL 3250637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the district court did not abuse its direction in determining that the Director showed a likelihood of irreparable harm where he established a likelihood of success on the merits
holding that the district court did 10 not abuse its direction in determining that the Director showed a likelihood of irreparable 11 harm where he established a likelihood of success on the merits
stating that it was unlikely that Congress intended the Court’s jurisdiction to turn on whether a § 10(j) petition was properly authorized
observing that “[a]s time passes, the benefits of unionization are lost and the spark to organize is extinguished”
stating that “[a] Section 10(j) proceeding” is one “in which the Board seeks injunctive relief to protect the lawful status quo while litigation is pending”
explaining that in assessing the likelihood of irreparable harm, the district court may consider “[t]he same evidence and legal conclusions” that were relevant to likelihood of success on the merits, “along with permissible inferences”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tashima, Fletcher, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Frankl v. HTH Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Frankl v. HTH CORP.
Ninth Circuit· 2011-07-13· cited 3×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.