Gore v. GTE South, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiff’s Section 504 claim failed because GTE Telephone Operations, a subsidiary of GTE Corporation, with which plaintiff was employed as a telephone operator, was not a program or activity that received federal financial assistance
• finding telephone operator with unpredictable absences was not a qualified individual as there was no way to accommodate unpredictable absences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).