· 6/6/1986
Wimbley v. Bolger
Citations
- 642 F. Supp. 481
- 40 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1855
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24587
- 41 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,616
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- An employee who “does not come to work cannot perform any of his job functions, essential or otherwise”
- “If the [Postal Service] is to meet its statutory mandate to provide efficient mail service, it must have employees who can be counted on to come to work on a regular basis.”
- interpreting analogous Rehabilitation Act; plaintiff was terminated for absenteeism
- regular attendance is an essential function of a job
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McRAE
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.