Ninth Circuit· 9/22/2011
GoPets Ltd. v. Hise
Citations
- 657 F.3d 1024
- 2011 WL 4394353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing Feltner and holding \there is no right to a jury trial when a judge awards the minimum statutory damages\
- discussing Feltner, the Ninth Circuit held “that there is no right to a jury trial when a judge awards the minimum statutory damages” and cited BMG Music with approval
- explaining that the prohibition contained in § 1125(d)(1) applies when a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a mark that is distinctive “at the time of registration of the domain name” and that a re-registration is not a “registration” within the meaning of § 1125(d
- “Registration of a domain name without more does not constitute service mark or trademark infringement”
- “The [defendants] waived that argument by failing to present it to the district court in a timely fashion.”
- “It is obvious that, under any reasonable definition, the initial contract with the registrar constitutes a ‘registration’ under ACPA”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Diarmuid F. O'scannlain, William A. Fletcher, and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rearden LLC v. Rearden Commerce, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2012-06-27· cited 195×
- Laki Kaahumanu v. State of Hawaii, Department OfNinth Circuit· 2012-06-06· cited 51×
- JYSK Bed'N Linen v. MONOSIJ DUTTA-ROYEleventh Circuit· 2015-12-16· cited 44×
- Xereas v. HeissDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-27· cited 35×
- MacKenzie Brown v. State of ArizonaNinth Circuit· 2023-09-25· cited 17×
- Zinner v. OlenychE.D. Virginia· 2015-06-04· cited 10×
- The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Shenzhen Stone Network Information Ltd.Fourth Circuit· 2023-01-24· cited 8×
- Vizer v. vizernews.comDistrict of Columbia· 2012-06-22· cited 6×
- Reed v. Ezelle Inv. Props. Inc.D. Oregon· 2018-11-05· cited 6×
- Nichols v. BrownC.D. California· 2013-03-03· cited 5×
- Curtis v. Illumination Arts, Inc.W.D. Washington· 2013-07-18· cited 3×
- Del Monte International Gmbh v. Del Monte Corp.C.D. California· 2014-02-05· cited 1×
- San Diego Comic Convention, Non-Profit Corp. v. Dan Farr Prods.S.D. California· 2018-08-23
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,275×
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationNinth Circuit· 1999-04-22· cited 774×
- Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.Supreme Court· 1998-03-31· cited 372×
- Nancy Walsh v. Nevada Department of Human Resources, Division of Healthcare, Finance and Policy State of NevadaNinth Circuit· 2006-12-18· cited 264×
- Lahoti v. VeriCheck, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2009-11-16· cited 107×
- Sporty's Farm v. Sportsman's Market, Inc.Second Circuit· 2000-02-02· cited 88×
- Bamonte v. City of MesaNinth Circuit· 2010-03-25· cited 66×
- United States v. NaderNinth Circuit· 2008-09-05· cited 63×
- BMG Music v. GonzalezSeventh Circuit· 2005-12-09· cited 47×
- Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Network Solutions, Inc.C.D. California· 1997-11-17· cited 44×
- Office Depot, Inc. v. ZuccariniNinth Circuit· 2010-02-26· cited 43×
- Thomas G. Carpenter v. Universal Star Shipping, S.A., a Foreign Corporation, and Sealaska Timber Corporation, a Foreign CorporationNinth Circuit· 1991-02-12· cited 42×
- Stephan Schmidheiny, an Individual v. Steven Weber, D/B/A Domainsale and famology.com, Inc. famology.com, IncThird Circuit· 2003-02-11· cited 14×
Other cases named GoPets Ltd. v. Hise
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.