Skip to main content
· 6/22/2012

Vizer v. vizernews.com

Citations

  • 869 F. Supp. 2d 75
  • 104 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1516
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86576
  • 2012 WL 2367130

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he [Rule 56.1] Statement improperly interjects arguments and/or immaterial facts in response to facts asserted by Defendant, without specifically controverting those facts.”
  • denying default judgment where court lacked jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Beryl A. Howell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.