Skip to main content
E.D. Virginia· 6/4/2015

Zinner v. Olenych

Citations

  • 108 F. Supp. 3d 369
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73280
  • 2015 WL 3539597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Typically, courts will not consider an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief.”
  • “The Court rejects Defendants’ argument that Mr. Fernandez’s statement that his client was ‘interested in selling [the edzinner.com] domain name’ cannot be construed as an ‘offer to sell’ the domain name.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.