Gonzalez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the surprise admission of improper testimony constituted a “trial by ambush” and was “inherently prejudicial”
• finding reversible error where, without any prior warning or notice to the defense, the state’s M.E. expert was permitted to testify to new matters outside of the autopsy report that were key to the State’s case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Banmah v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-25· cited 3×
• Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-11· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tillman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-06-06· cited 309×
• Binger v. King Pest Control
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-16· cited 187×
• Office Depot, Inc. v. Miller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-24· cited 37×
• Department of Health and Rehab. v. Jb
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-19· cited 19×
• Keller Industries v. Volk
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-21· cited 18×
• Barrett v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-11-23· cited 17×
• Michaels v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-13· cited 6×
• Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. McKenna
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-03· cited 4×