Skip to main content
· 7/24/1991

Office Depot, Inc. v. Miller

Citations

  • 584 So. 2d 587
  • 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7085
  • 1991 WL 134054

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial judge has broad discretion in deciding whether to permit or exclude witness' testimony; discovery rules should be construed and utilized to avoid \trial by ambush\
  • holding that trial judge has broad discretion in deciding whether to permit or exclude a witness’s testimony and that discovery rules should be construed and utilized to avoid “trial by ambush.”
  • affirming order granting new trial on basis of surprise where, during trial, expert witness \recanted\ his opinion given during discovery
  • affirming order granting new trial on basis of surprise where, during trial, expert witness “recanted” his opinion given during discovery
  • expanding Binger principle to hold that allowing the presentation of a witness's changed testimony is tantamount to permitting an undisclosed adverse witness to testify
  • Failure to disclose to plaintiff the defense expert's changed opinion that there was no causal relationship between the accident and the injury after he previously opined that there was required a new trial.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anstead

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.