District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/27/1993
Gomez v. State
Citations
- 621 So. 2d 578
- 1993 WL 277088
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no double jeopardy violation was involved in prosecution of DUI charge after defendant’s driver’s license was seized because of same conduct
- no double jeopardy violation is involved in the prosecution of a DUI charge after a driver's license has been seized under F.S. § 322.2615 because of the same conduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Barkdull and Cope
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HigaHawaii Supreme Court· 1995-05-17· cited 150×
- State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court· 1997-05-01· cited 70×
- Bolware v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-09-18· cited 22×
- Davidson v. MacKinnonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-02· cited 21×
- State v. MurrayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-09-28· cited 19×
- Ex Parte MataTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1996-06-06· cited 9×
- Stabler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-02-07
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.