Freeman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he purpose of the statute providing for revocation of a driver’s license upon conviction of a licensee for driving while intoxicated is to provide an administrative remedy for public protection and not for punishment of the offender.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Higa
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1995-05-17· cited 150×
• Luk v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-11-27· cited 89×
• State v. Hansen
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1996-01-26· cited 75×
• State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. Kennedy
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-10-18· cited 75×
• State v. Zerkel
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1995-07-28· cited 60×
• Davidson v. MacKinnon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-02· cited 21×
• State v. Murray
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-09-28· cited 19×
• Krall v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-08-21· cited 15×
• Gomez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-27· cited 10×
• State v. Lomas
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-04-02· cited 9×
• Ex Parte Mata
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1996-06-06· cited 9×
• Lindemann v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1993-11-01· cited 3×
• State v. Atkinson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-05· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Tench
  Henrico County Circuit Court· 1995-03-22

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Halper
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
• Smith v. City of Gainesville
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1957-03-01· cited 43×
• Ellis v. Pierce
  California Court of Appeal· 1991-06-06· cited 24×