Goldstein v. Securities & Exchange Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that agency’s interpretation was unreasonable even if not foreclosed because it was inconsistent with statutory language and purpose
• explaining that, whether an agency’s construction is reasonable depends, in part, “on the construction’s fit with the statutory language, as well as its conformity to statutory purposes” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).