United States v. $6,976,934.65, Plus Interest Deposited Into Royal Bank of Scotland International, Account No. 2029-56141070, Held in the Name of Soulbury Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “mere notice or knowledge of an outstanding warrant, coupled with a refusal to enter the United States, does not satisfy the statute”
• rejecting the government’s argument that as a matter of law civil forfeiture claimant had constructively fled because he last left the United States six years before being criminally charged
• “Likewise, under the third prong, Scott’s renunciation of his U.S. citizenship is insufficient without some evidence that he took this action to avoid extradition.” (emphasis added)
• “Likewise, under the third prong, Scott’s renunciation of his U.S. citizenship is insufficient without some evidence that he took this action to avoid extradition.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).